Concise Control Flow with if let
and while let
if let
The if let
syntax lets you combine if
and let
into a less verbose way to handle values that match one pattern while ignoring the rest. Consider the program in Listing 6-4 that matches on an Option::Some<u8>
value in the config_max
variable but only wants to execute code if the value is Option::Some
variant.
fn main() {
let config_max = Option::Some(5);
match config_max {
Option::Some(max) => println!("The maximum is configured to be {}", max),
_ => (),
}
}
If the value is Option::Some
, we print out the value in the Option::Some
variant by binding
the value to the variable max
in the pattern. We don’t want to do anything
with the None
value. To satisfy the match
expression, we have to add _ => ()
after processing just one variant, which is annoying boilerplate code to
add.
Instead, we could write this in a shorter way using if let
. The following
code behaves the same as the match
in Listing 6-4:
fn main() {
let number = Option::Some(5);
if let Option::Some(max) = number {
println!("The maximum is configured to be {}", max);
}
}
The syntax if let
takes a pattern and an expression separated by an equal
sign. It works the same way as a match
, where the expression is given to the
match
and the pattern is its first arm. In this case, the pattern is
Option::Some(max)
, and max
binds to the value inside Option::Some
. We can then
use max
in the body of the if let
block in the same way we used max
in
the corresponding match
arm. The code in the if let
block isn’t run if the
value doesn’t match the pattern.
Using if let
means less typing, less indentation, and less boilerplate code.
However, you lose the exhaustive checking that match
enforces. Choosing
between match
and if let
depends on what you’re doing in your particular
situation and whether gaining conciseness is an appropriate trade-off for
losing exhaustive checking.
In other words, you can think of if let
as syntactic sugar for a match
that
runs code when the value matches one pattern and then ignores all other values.
We can include an else
with an if let
. The block of code that goes with else
is the same as the block of code that would go with the _
case in the match
expression. Recall the Coin
enum definition in Listing 6-2,
where the Quarter
variant also held a UsState
value. If we wanted to count
all non-quarter coins we see while also announcing the state of the quarters,
we could do that with a match
expression, like this:
#[derive(Drop)]
enum Coin {
Penny,
Nickel,
Dime,
Quarter,
}
fn main() {
let coin = Coin::Quarter;
let mut count = 0;
match coin {
Coin::Quarter => println!("You got a quarter!"),
_ => count += 1,
}
}
Or we could use an if let
and else
expression, like this:
#[derive(Drop)]
enum Coin {
Penny,
Nickel,
Dime,
Quarter,
}
fn main() {
let coin = Coin::Quarter;
let mut count = 0;
if let Coin::Quarter = coin {
println!("You got a quarter!");
} else {
count += 1;
}
println!("{}", count);
}
If you have a situation in which your program has logic that is too verbose to
express using match
, remember that if let
is in your Cairo toolbox as well.
while let
The while let
syntax is similar to the if let
syntax, but it allows you to loop over a collection of values and execute a block of code for each value that matches a specified pattern. In the case below, the pattern is Option::Some(x)
, which matches any Some
variant of the Option
enum.
fn main() {
let mut arr = array![1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9];
let mut sum = 0;
while let Option::Some(value) = arr.pop_front() {
sum += value;
};
println!("{}", sum);
}
Using while let
provides a more concise and idiomatic way of writing this loop compared to a traditional while
loop with explicit pattern matching or handling of the Option
type. However, as with if let
, you lose the exhaustive checking that a match
expression provides, so you need to be careful to handle any remaining cases outside the while let
loop if necessary.